Art3_Redlands_FY17_BikePed_EValleyInterconnect_App
Transportation Development Act Article 3 Phase 1 Call for Projects
For Active Transportation Program Local Match Assistance
Please use this MS Word file as your response to the Call-for-Projects
Responsible Parties
Project Name East Valley Corridor Bike Route Interconnect Project
Applicant (Agency name) City of Redlands
Applicant Contact (Name, title, email, phone #
of individual authorizing the application)
Chris Diggs, Director, Municipal Utilities and Engineering,
cdiggs@cityofredlands.org, (909) 798-7658
Partner Name(s) (if applicable) City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino Coutny
Project Type
Bicycle
(Bicycle projects must be consistent
with San Bernardino County NMTP)
Pedestrian
Bicycle/Pedestrian
Safe Routes to School
Recreational Trail
Overview and Description of the Project (0-30 points)
Provide basic information regarding the nature and location of the project, prior project
development activities, if any, current status, and overall scope of the proposed effort.
Additional background information, photos, etc. may be attached, but are not required.
Summary
The City of Redlands, in conjunction with the City of San Bernardino and the County of San Bernardino,
seeks to improve connectivity between cycling routes in the northwest part of the City of Redlands and
the County Donut Hole. At present, Redlands has more than 28 miles of existing bicycle routes and
another 9 miles of funded lanes yet to be installed. However, these routes, while each serving an
important need in a specific community, are not connected together in a comprehensive network.
Cyclists are required to navigate unmarked road sections while crossing from one trail segment to
another within the system. These gaps discourage wider use of the system and increase confusion
among riders.
The City’s substantial investments in cycling routes over the last few years have developed many
individual pieces of the network and the City is now well positioned to take advantage of a unique
opportunity to improve system connectivity presented by the upcoming Phase IV extension of the Santa
Ana River Trail (SART). Building on the SART alignment between California and Opal through North
Redlands, this proposed ATP Cycle 3 project leverages a few short segments of new cycling lanes to
connect together three major regional trails, the Orange Blossom Trail (OBT), the SART, and three
sections of the East Valley Corridor multipurpose trail system. Additionally, the project extends the
Redlands bicycle network north to the City limits of Highland, interconnecting the growing Highland
network (including a proposed ATP Cycle 3 project within Highland) and providing Highland and San
Bernardino residents with safer connectivity across the Santa Ana River to SART. Finally, the project
connects to the disadvantaged community in the City of San Bernardino, west of Mountain View
between the freeway and the River. This connection provides residents in that community with access
not only to the SART and East Valley Corridor trails but also to growing employment opportunities in the
warehouse district along San Bernardino Avenue and to destinations in the Citrus Plaza and Mountain
Grove shopping centers for recreation and employment.
In addition to linking several major trails and cycling networks, our proposed lanes improve systemic
access to a range of destinations and amenities including:
• A possible future Redlands Rail station on Mountain View
• Packinghouse Christian Academy (San Bernardino and Alabama)
• Citrus Plaza and Mountain Grove centers
• Kaiser Permanente facility on California
• Citrus Valley High School (via proposed SART alignment)
• Lugonia High-Density Residential Community (just west of Alabama)
• Employment opportunities with:
o Clorox
o Kimberly Clark
o Amazon
o Payless ShoeSource
o Kaiser Permanente
o Home Depot
o Ashley Furniture
o Southern California Edison
o Lamps Plus
o BMW
o And many more
Proposed Facilities
Specifically our proposed project is comprised of the following segments:
• Class I/IV bikeway
o Along the West side of Alabama, north from the SART to a future signal in front of
Robertson’s Ready Mix plant near the Redlands/Highland city limits
Signal and short section of road improvements to be installed by property
owner and will provide connectivity between Class I across the River and Class II
into Highland
• Class II bike lane striping
o Along San Bernardino Ave from Mountain View east to Alabama
o Along Alabama from Lugonia north to Pioneer (connection with SART at the
Pioneer/Alabama signal crossing)
o Along east side of Alabama from signal at Robertson’s Ready Mix (CUP requirement)
north to Highland city limits (west side lane north from the signal runs through City of
San Bernardino right of way and will be installed as part of a separate City of Highland
project)
• Class III sharrows on north end of California Street connecting SART to existing East Valley
Corridor multipurpose trail
• Midblock crossing and warning beacon for interconnectivity between San Bernardino Class II
facilities and existing Multipurpose trail (running north from San Bernardino Avenue between
California Street and Mountain View Avenue)
In addition to the actual lane and bikeway installations, the project will install the following safety and
usability features:
• Green paint on all conflict zones
• Way-finding signage
• No-parking signage (as appropriate per planning guidelines)
• Bike lane signs and markings
• Bicycle detection loops at signals
Safety Improvements
Currently, both Alabama Street and San Bernardino Avenue lack cycling facilities entirely. Both streets
are subject to heavy traffic, including cement trucks from the mining operations in the riverbed and
cargo trucks operating out of the warehouse district along San Bernardino Avenue. For cyclists seeking
access to amenities along either route, connectivity between Highland and Redlands, or access to the
SART from any of the surrounding communities, the challenges of riding in this area are substantial.
Over the last ten years, there have been eight recorded bicycle accidents and one pedestrian collision
along our proposed routes.
Interagency Collaboration
This project is the result of collaboration between several agencies including Redlands, San Bernardino
City, San Bernardino County and Highland all of whom share a substantial interest in the facilities
proposed. Due to practicality considerations, Highland will be pursuing a complimentary project which
connects where this project ends on Alabama Street at the city limits between Redlands and Highland,
thereby completing connectivity between the two city cycling networks. A letter of support from
Highland demonstrates their commitment to implementing this project as well as their own.
Consistency with Local and Regional Planning
All of the facilities proposed by this project are consistent with, and prioritized in the Redlands Bicycle
Master Plan, as well as the County’s Nonmotorized Transportation Plan and the East Valley Corridor Plan
Specific Plan.
Project Funding
ATP funds to be requested in Cycle 3 (80% of
total project cost) $2,112,105
Requested matching funds from TDA Article 3
(16% of total project cost) $422,421
20% Local Match (4% of total project cost –
please also identify the source of those funds) $105,605.25
Total project funds $2,640,131
Narrative Question
RESPOND TO THE DRAFT ATP CRITERIA BY DESCRIBING BRIEFLY THE BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT
RELATED TO INCREASING ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION MODE SHARE, SAFETY, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, COST
EFFECTIVENESS, AND PUBLIC HEALTH.
(PLEASE NOTE THE QUESTIONS IN THE ATP CYCLE 3 APPLICATION FOR DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION OF EACH
CRITERION – BULLET POINTS MAY BE USED TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS – ADDITIONAL MATERIAL MAY BE
ATTACHED, BUT IS NOT REQUIRED)
(0-20 POINTS)
1. Describe how your project will encourage increased bicycling and walking and generally improve the
ease of travel for non-motorized users
A. The entirety of the proposed project is situated within a disadvantaged community (DAC) and
serves two other DACs immediately adjacent to project routes:
a. City of San Bernardino section west of Mountain View between I10 and River
b. City of Highland section east of Palm and north of the River
B. Identification of disadvantaged community based on median income at the census tract level.
C. The project is a direct benefit to a DAC because it is situated in, and provides connectivity
between, multiple DACs and routes or surrounding amenities.
a. This project connects several regional trails and bike route networks and provides DAC
residents with system access.
b. Members of identified DACs have easy direct access to proposed improvements which
run directly through or adjacent to affected communities.
c. The Redlands Bicycle Master Plan, County Nonmotorized Transportation Plan, and East
Valley Corridor specific plan were all developed with extensive community input.
Proposed project routes are listed and prioritized in these plans.
d. 100% of this project is situated in a DAC and two other DACs are immediately adjacent
to project facilities.
2. Describe how the project creates or improves walking and/or bicycling routes and connectivity to
destinations, and how it removes barriers to walking and/or bicycling.
A. This project addresses three needs:
a. Limited DAC access to cycling network and associated amenities or destinations
b. Gaps in the existing networks which discouraging mode shift
c. Route safety
B. The project achieves these goals by:
a. Situating project facilities within and adjacent to DAC locations and connecting those
communities to various destinations along newly interconnected routes
b. Connecting existing and funded regional routes (such as Orange Blossom Trail and SART)
with Highland, Redlands and County cycling networks
c. Improves visibility of cyclists along Alabama and San Bernardino and provides protected
Class I across Santa Ana River
C. This project is a priority for all participating agencies. It has been identified as a level one priority
in the Redlands Bike Master plan and is identified, by incorporation, in the County’s
Nonmotorized transportation plan.
3. Describe how the project reduces the number and/or rate of pedestrian and bicycle fatalities and
injuries.
A. There have been nine bicycle or pedestrian accidents along project routes in the last 10 years of
data. As traffic and population increase, especially along the rapidly developing warehouse
districts and in the shopping plazas, the rate of accidents could increase without route
improvements.
B. Safety countermeasures
a. Hazards along proposed routes include:
i. Heavy truck traffic (including mining and cement trucks)
ii. Increasing shopping traffic
iii. Increased cycling and vehicular traffic to newly situated housing community
iv. Two school sites with children arriving on bikes via unmarked roadways
v. A medical facility reachable by bike but lacking cycling facilities
vi. DAC members who may cycle to work but lack appropriate cycling routes
b. This project provides highly visible Class II bicycling facilities, improved intersection
safety for cyclists, improved access to sections of protected cycling facilities (Class I),
and a new Class I route across the River, all of which improve safety along proposed
routes. In addition, the increased connectivity of the network allows cyclists to plan
longer in-network trips reaching a much larger list of destinations thereby encouraging
cycling mode shift.
4. Describe the community-based public participation process that culminated in the project proposal.
A. Redlands bike master plan incorporates significant public participation including input regarding
the methodology for prioritizing projects.
B. All affected community members had broad opportunity to participate in project planning
through the bike master plan process.
C. Feedback was solicited in person (workshops and town hall meetings) and through an online
website on multiple well-publicized occasions.
D. Stakeholders continue to have influence over implementation through the City Council process
informed by regular public updates and through ongoing access to information from city staff.
5. Describe the health issues in the project area and how the project will address each of them. Provide
local health data and sources, and collaborative efforts with health agencies where possible.
A. County level data shows a poor overall health ranking (47 of 58). Specifically, this community
faces high levels of adult obesity (climbing) and poor access to physical activity when compared
against state and national trends.
B. By increasing the usability of associated cycling networks, we increase the potential for mode
shift to cycling as a transportation alternative. That mode shift has a direct positive impact on
obesity by improving opportunities for physical activity.
6. Explain why the project is considered to have the highest Benefit to Cost Ration (B/C) with respect to
the ATP purpose and goals of “increased use of active modes of transportation”.
Our project requires only a few short sections of new construction in order to interconnect a total of five
different cycling networks and trails. By leveraging existing routes, this project dramatically increases
system wide usability at minimal cost. As a result, our benefit to cost ratio is exceptionally good in terms
of improving active transportation choices in affected communities.
Project Programming Request Form
Please fill out the first page of the Caltrans Project Programming Request Form (PPR) with as much available
project information as possible. Please document the timeline for completed phases as well as for ongoing and
proposed phases. Basic information on the description of the project, location, and scope of work should be
provided in the Word file, not the PPR. The PPR has been provided as a separate Excel file.
Attached separately.
DTP-0001 (Revised July 2013)
End Closeout Phase (Closeout Report)
End Environmental Phase (PA&ED Milestone)
Begin Design (PS&E) Phase
End Design Phase (Ready to List for Advertisement Milestone)
Begin Right of Way Phase
Right of Way
SCAG
Project Title
Project ID
End Right of Way Phase (Right of Way Certification Milestone)
Begin Construction Phase (Contract Award Milestone)
PS&E
Construction
Kjeld Lindsted
PPNO
County Project Sponsor/Lead Agency
City of Redlands
EA
PM Bk PM Ahd
08
Local
Project Manager/Contact
SB
Local Assistance
Draft Project Report
Route/Corridor
10/01/19
ProposedProject Milestone
District
PA&ED
07/01/20
06/30/22
06/30/20
Implementing Agency
City of Redlands
City of Redlands
City of Redlands
Begin Environmental (PA&ED) Phase
Participating agencies each have growing cycling networks but gaps limit opportunities to use the various
parts as a cohesive system which discourages use. As a result, many communities cannot currently rely on
existing cycling routes to reach key regional destinations such as schools, medical facilities, places of
employment, or recreation trails. For disadvantaged communities who may rely on cycling routes for access
to employment and amenities, these gaps can be especially challenging.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ● DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST
Date:4/7/16
General Instructions
Proposed Class II bike routes along San Bernardino Avenue and Alabama Street in Redlands and County
territory and Class I route across Santa Ana River to Highland. Project connects SART Phase IV, OBT, and
East Valley Corridor Trails to Redlands and Highland cycling networks. Leveraging existing routes, project
eliminates gaps and adds key destinations to the network thereby offering a cost effective way to maximize
active transportation options for surrounding communities many of which are disadvantaged. See attached
map for proposed route details.
MPO
Location, Project Limits, Description, Scope of Work See page 2
East Valley Corridor Bike Route Interconnect Project
MPO ID TCRP No.
For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD
(916) 654-3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.
02/01/21
07/01/21
01/01/22
01/01/21
E-mail Address
Project Study Report Approved
Component
Phone
909-798-7527 x. 8
Includes Bike/Ped ImprovementsIncludes ADA Improvements
Element
klindsted@cityofredlands.org
Supports Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Goals Reduces Greenhouse Gas Emissions
City of Redlands
Purpose and Need See page 2
Project Benefits See page 2
By linking major regional cycling trails and networks, this project provides improved system-wide connectivity
thereby reducing risk of accident, increasing opportunities for active transpiration mode shift, and encouraging
broader use of existing cycling routes for communities across the sub region. This is especially true for
disadvantaged communities within project catchment areas.
End Construction Phase (Construction Contract Acceptance Milestone)
Document TypeCirculate Draft Environmental Document
ADA Notice
08/01/22
09/30/22
Begin Closeout Phase
New Project
2 of 4
DTP-0001 (Revised July 2013)Date:4/7/16
District EA
08
Project Title:
Component Prior 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20+Total
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
Fund No. 1:
Component Prior 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20+Total
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
Fund No. 2:
Component Prior 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20+Total
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
Fund No. 3:
Component Prior 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20+Total
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ● DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Route TCRP No.
PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST
County Project ID PPNO
East Valley Corridor Bike Route Interconnect Project
LocalSB
Program Code
Proposed Funding ($1,000s)
Proposed Total Project Cost ($1,000s)Notes
Funding Agency
Program Code
Proposed Funding ($1,000s)
Funding Agency
Funding Agency
Program Code
Proposed Funding ($1,000s)
3 of 4
DTP-0001 (Revised July 2013)Date:4/7/16
District EA
08
Project Title:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ● DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Route TCRP No.
PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST
County Project ID PPNO
East Valley Corridor Bike Route Interconnect Project
LocalSB
Fund No. 4:
Component Prior 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20+Total
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
Fund No. 5:
Component Prior 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20+Total
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
Fund No. 6:
Component Prior 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20+Total
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
Fund No. 7:
Component Prior 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20+Total
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
Program Code
Program Code
Proposed Funding ($1,000s)
Proposed Funding ($1,000s)
Funding Agency
Proposed Funding ($1,000s)
Funding Agency
Funding Agency
Program Code
Funding Agency
Program Code
Proposed Funding ($1,000s)
4 of 4
DTP-0001 (Revised July 2013)Date:4/7/16
District EA
08
Project Title:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ● DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Route TCRP No.
PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST
County Project ID PPNO
East Valley Corridor Bike Route Interconnect Project
LocalSB
Fund No. 8:
Component Prior 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20+Total
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
Fund No. 9:
Component Prior 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20+Total
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
Fund No. 10:
Component Prior 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20+Total
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
Program Code
Proposed Funding ($1,000s)
Funding Agency
Program Code
Proposed Funding ($1,000s)
Funding Agency
Funding Agency
Program Code
Proposed Funding ($1,000s)
TDA ARTICLE 3
SAN BERNARDINO AVENUE
ITEM #ITEM UNIT UNIT PRICE QTY TOTAL QTY TOTAL
1 Mobilization LS 5,000.00$ 1 5,000.00$ 1 5,000.00$
2 Traffic Control LS 5,000.00$ 1 5,000.00$ 1 5,000.00$
3 Thermoplastic Bike Lane Striping LF 1.50$ 19300 28,950.00$ 16200 24,300.00$
4 Thermoplastic Bike Buffer Hatch LF 1.50$ 4200 6,300.00$ 1700 2,550.00$
5 Green Bike Lane Entry Marking EA 2,000.00$ 5 10,000.00$ 6 12,000.00$
6 Green Conflict Zone Marking SF 10.00$ 3000 30,000.00$ 3700 37,000.00$
7 Bike Lane Sign EA 300.00$ 5 1,500.00$ 7 2,100.00$
8 Wayfinding Sign EA 500.00$ 4 2,000.00$ 5 2,500.00$
9 Remove Existing Striping SF 0.50$ 1600 800.00$ 16000 8,000.00$
10 Type 2 REAS Slurry Seal SF 0.50$ 1600 800.00$ 35000 17,500.00$
11 1.5" Grind and Overlay SF 2.00$ 0 -$ 13000 26,000.00$
12 Traffic Control Signs EA 500.00$ 3 1,500.00$ 10 5,000.00$
13 Bike Detection Loops & Pavement Marking EA 2,000.00$ 4 8,000.00$ 3 6,000.00$
14 Bike Box EA 12,000.00$ 0 -$ 1 12,000.00$
15 Miscellaneous Pavement Marking EA 300.00$ 3 900.00$ 12 3,600.00$
16 Miscellaneous Pavement Striping LF 1.50$ 0 -$ 1900 2,850.00$
17 RRFB System & Crosswalk EA 100,000.00$ 1 100,000.00$ 0 -$
SUB-TOTAL 200,750.00$ SUB-TOTAL 171,400.00$
372,150.00$
37,215.00$
409,365.00$
-$
-$
-$
81,873.00$
61,404.75$
552,642.75$ PROJECT TOTAL
CE (15%)
MOUNTAIN VIEW TO
CALIFONIA (REDLANDS)
CALIFORNIA TO ALABAMA
(SB COUNTY)
CONSTRUCTION SUB-TOTAL
10% CONTINGENCY
PS&E (20%)
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
R/W ACQUISITION
PERMITS
TDA ARTICLE 3
ALABAMA STREET - LUGONIA TO PIONEER
ITEM #ITEM UNIT UNIT PRICE QTY TOTAL
1 Mobilization LS 5,000.00$ 1 5,000.00$
2 Traffic Control LS 5,000.00$ 1 5,000.00$
3 Thermoplastic Bike Lane Striping LF 1.50$ 6400 9,600.00$
4 Green Bike Lane Entry Marking EA 2,000.00$ 9 18,000.00$
5 Green Conflict Zone Marking SF 10.00$ 3600 36,000.00$
6 Bike Lane Sign EA 300.00$ 14 4,200.00$
7 Wayfinding Sign EA 500.00$ 6 3,000.00$
8 Remove Existing Striping SF 0.50$ 13000 6,500.00$
9 Type 2 REAS Slurry Seal SF 0.50$ 13000 6,500.00$
10 Traffic Control Signs EA 500.00$ 3 1,500.00$
11 Bike Detection Loops & Pavement Marking EA 2,000.00$ 7 14,000.00$
12 Bike Box EA 12,000.00$ 1 12,000.00$
13 Miscellaneous Pavement Marking EA 300.00$ 6 1,800.00$
SUB-TOTAL 123,100.00$
123,100.00$
12,310.00$
135,410.00$
-$
-$
-$
27,082.00$
20,311.50$
182,803.50$
LUGONIA TO PIONEER
(SB COUNTY)
PERMITS
PS&E (20%)
CE (15%)
PROJECT TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION SUB-TOTAL
10% CONTINGENCY
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
R/W ACQUISITION
TDA ARTICLE 3
ALABAMA STREET - SANTA ANA RIVER
ITEM #ITEM UNIT UNIT PRICE QTY TOTAL QTY TOTAL
1 Mobilization LS 50,000.00$ 1 50,000.00$ 0 -$
2 SWPPP LS 10,000.00$ 1 10,000.00$ 0 -$
3 Traffic Control LS 15,000.00$ 1 15,000.00$ 0 -$
4 Clearing and Grubbing SF 0.10$ 98400 9,840.00$ 21600 2,160.00$
5 Thermoplastic Bike Lane Striping LF 1.50$ 9000 13,500.00$ 3000 4,500.00$
6 Grading SF 0.50$ 98400 49,200.00$ 21600 10,800.00$
7 Scarify 16' Wide & Compact 12" Deep CY 15.00$ 2500 37,500.00$ 500 7,500.00$
8 Earthwork Import CY 20.00$ 5500 110,000.00$ 1200 24,000.00$
9 4" AC for Bike Path TON 100.00$ 1000 100,000.00$ 200 20,000.00$
10 6" Base for Bike Path CY 80.00$ 700 56,000.00$ 160 12,800.00$
11 Remove Existing Striping SF 0.50$ 45000 22,500.00$ 0 -$
12 Type 2 REAS Slurry Seal SF 0.50$ 45000 22,500.00$ 0 -$
13 Slope Stabilization SF 3.00$ 13000 39,000.00$ 3000 9,000.00$
14 Wayfinding Sign EA 500.00$ 8 4,000.00$ 0 -$
15 Traffic Control Signs EA 300.00$ 4 1,200.00$ 0 -$
16 Solar Powered LED Lights EA 5,500.00$ 32 176,000.00$ 8 44,000.00$
17 Vinyl Fence LF 30.00$ 3250 97,500.00$ 750 22,500.00$
18 K-Rail Barrier Along Bridge for Class 4 LF 100.00$ 500 50,000.00$ 0 -$
19 Guardrail Improvements LS 40,000.00$ 1 40,000.00$ 0 -$
20 Modify Drainage Outlet EA 10,000.00$ 6 60,000.00$ 0 -$
SUB-TOTAL 963,740.00$ SUB-TOTAL 157,260.00$
1,121,000.00$
112,100.00$
1,233,100.00$
75,000.00$
150,000.00$
15,000.00$
246,620.00$
184,965.00$
1,904,685.00$
SANTA ANA RIVER
(CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO)SANTA ANA RIVER (REDLANDS)
CONSTRUCTION SUB-TOTAL
10% CONTINGENCY
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
R/W ACQUISITION
PERMITS
PS&E (20%)
CE (15%)
PROJECT TOTAL
TDA ARTICLE 3
SUMMARY OF COSTS
SEGMENT ENV.R/W PERMITS PS&E CE CON TOTAL
SAN BERNARDINO AVENUE -$ -$ -$ 81,873.00$ 61,404.75$ 409,365.00$ 552,642.75$
ALABAMA STREET - LUGONIA TO PIONEER -$ -$ -$ 27,082.00$ 20,311.50$ 135,410.00$ 182,803.50$
ALABAMA STREET - SANTA ANA RIVER TO CITY LIMIT 75,000.00$ 150,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 246,620.00$ 184,965.00$ 1,233,100.00$ 1,904,685.00$
TOTAL COST 75,000.00$ 150,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 355,575.00$ 266,681.25$ 1,777,875.00$ 2,640,131.25$
TYPE ENV.R/W PERMITS PS&E CE CON TOTAL
ATP FUNDS (80%)60,000.00$ 120,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 284,460.00$ 213,345.00$ 1,422,300.00$ 2,112,105.00$
TDA ARTICLE 3 FUNDS (16%)12,000.00$ 24,000.00$ 2,400.00$ 56,892.00$ 42,669.00$ 284,460.00$ 422,421.00$
LOCAL FUNDS (4%)3,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 600.00$ 14,223.00$ 10,667.25$ 71,115.00$ 105,605.25$
TOTAL COST 75,000.00$ 150,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 355,575.00$ 266,681.25$ 1,777,875.00$ 2,640,131.25$
TYPE ENV.R/W PERMITS PS&E CE CON TOTAL
CITY OF REDLANDS 3,000.00$ -$ 600.00$ 10,247.51$ 7,685.63$ 51,237.56$ 72,770.71$
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO -$ -$ -$ 2,591.60$ 1,943.70$ 12,958.00$ 17,493.30$
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO -$ 6,000.00$ -$ 1,383.89$ 1,037.92$ 6,919.44$ 15,341.24$
TOTAL COST 3,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 600.00$ 14,223.00$ 10,667.25$ 71,115.00$ 105,605.25$
PROJECT COSTS
FUNDING BREAKDOWN
LOCAL FUND SPLITS
kj
kj
kj
kj
§¨10
§¨2 1 0
Proposed Mt. View Rail Station Kaiser Permanente
Circa 2020 Apartments
Packinghouse Christian Academy
Mountain Grove Shopping Center
Citrus Plaza Shopping Center
Citrus Valley High School
I-10 Freeway Alabama StSan Bernardino Ave
Mountain View AveLugonia Ave I-210 FreewayOrange StEast Valley CorridorBike RouteInterconnect Project
Existing Cla ss 1Bike Path
Prop osed Sa nta AnaRiver Trail
Prop osed C lass 1Bike Path
Prop osed C lass 2Bike Lane
Prop osed C lass 3Bike Route
kj Route Co nnections
Facilities
City Limits
1/4 MileBike Catchment
1 M ileBike Catchment
0 1,000 2,000 3,000Feet
Scale
This map was produced by the City of Redlands,Geographic Information System. The City of Redlands assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. The data used to generate this map is dynamicin nature, therefore the information shown may or may not be the most current.
April 6, 2016
wo1416ATP_Grant.mxd
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CITY OF REDLAND S
COUNTY OF SAN BERN ARDIN O
CITY OF HIGHLAND
CITY OF REDLAND S
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
2010-2014 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Thematic Map of Estimate; INCOME AND BENEFITS (IN 2014 INFLATION-ADJUSTED DOLLARS) - Total households - Median
household income (dollars)
Geography by: Census Tract
Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Survey
website in the Data and Documentation section.
Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American Community
Survey website in the Methodology section.
Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, it is the Census Bureau's Population
Estimates Program that produces and disseminates the official estimates of the population for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns and
estimates of housing units for states and counties.
Legend:
Data Classes
Persons
37,404 - 37,404
46,818 - 47,343
Boundaries
Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is
represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted
roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of
error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to
nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these
tables.
Workers include members of the Armed Forces and civilians who were at work last week.
Occupation codes are 4-digit codes and are based on Standard Occupational Classification 2010.
Industry codes are 4-digit codes and are based on the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). The Census industry codes for 2013
and later years are based on the 2012 revision of the NAICS. To allow for the creation of 2010-2014 tables, industry data in the multiyear files (2010-
2014) were recoded to 2013 Census industry codes. We recommend using caution when comparing data coded using 2013 Census industry codes
with data coded using Census industry codes prior to 2013. For more information on the Census industry code changes, please visit our website at
http://www.census.gov/people/io/methodology/.
Logical coverage edits applying a rules-based assignment of Medicaid, Medicare and military health coverage were added as of 2009 -- please see
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/hlthins/publications/coverage_edits_final.pdf for more details. The corresponding 2008 data table in American
FactFinder does not incorporate these edits and is therefore not comparable to this table in 2009, 2010, 2011, or 2012. Select geographies of 2008
data comparable to the 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012 tables are accessible at http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/hlthins/data/acs/2008/re-run.html.
The health insurance coverage category names were modified in 2010. See ACS Health Insurance Definitions for a list of the insurance type
definitions.
While the 2010-2014 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the February 2013 Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
definitions of metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; in certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the
1 of 2 04/01/2016
principal cities shown in ACS tables may differ from the OMB definitions due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities.
Estimates of urban and rural population, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 2010 data. As
a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarily reflect the results of ongoing urbanization.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010-2014 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Explanation of Symbols:
1. An '**' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to
compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.
2. An '-' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an
estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an
open-ended distribution.
3. An '-' following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution.
4. An '+' following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution.
5. An '***' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A
statistical test is not appropriate.
6. An '*****' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.
7. An 'N' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of
sample cases is too small.
8. An '(X)' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available.
CITY OF REDLANDS
CITY OF REDLANDS
CONCEPTUAL PLANS FOR
APRIL 2016
CITY OF REDLANDSGRAPHIC SCALE
CITY OF REDLANDSGRAPHIC SCALE
CITY OF REDLANDSGRAPHIC SCALE
CITY OF REDLANDSGRAPHIC SCALE
CITY OF REDLANDSGRAPHIC SCALE
CITY OF REDLANDSGRAPHIC SCALE
CITY OF REDLANDSGRAPHIC SCALE
CITY OF REDLANDSGRAPHIC SCALE
CITY OF REDLANDS
ALABAMASTW SAN BERNARDINO AVE NNEVADAST3R D S T
W LUGONIA AVEALABAMA STTEXAS STLUGO NIA AVE
3RD BLVD
W PIONEER AVE
W SAN BERNARDINO AVEMARIGOLD AVEPALMETTO AVE
W LUGONIA AVE
3RD BLVD 100T
HBLVDW 210 FRWYE210FRWYYBLVDZ BLVD
X BLVD
W BLVD
E CURT IS LN OHIOSTWEBSTERSTELISE DR
U BLVD
RUBY AVEE210FRWYW210FRWY107TH BLVDE H A RDTS
TARLENESTFRANCESSTKARONSTFURLOWDRCASTLEGATELNC ENTRAL BLVD
CALHOUNSTCALIFORNIA STRESEARCH DRBALDWIN AVE
MOUN T AIN GROVE
E RIVERVIEW DR
E CO OL EY AVE
E VICTORIA AVENORTONBLVD COLORADOSTRIVER BLUFF AVE
DOMESTIC AVE
W PIO NEER AVE
TENNESSEESTM I L L S T
AL MO ND AVE
PERIMETER BLVD ATP CYCLE 3
0 560 1,120 1,680Feet
Scale
OneStop.mxd
PROPOSED SANTA ANA RIVER TRAIL
PROPOSED SANTA ANA RIVER TRAILEXISTING EAST VALLEY CORRIDOR MULTI-PURPOSE TRAIL
CITY OF REDLANDSPROPOSED CLASS 3 BIKE ROUTE
EXISTING EASTVALLEY CORRIDOR CLASS 1 BIKE PATH
ORANGE BLOSSO M TRAIL PHASE 3
EXISTING EAST VALLEY CORRIDOR MULTI-PURPOSE TRAIL
COUNTY PROPOSED CLASS 2 BIKE LANE
CITY OF REDLANDSPROPOSED CLASS 2 BIKE LANE
PROPOSED SANTA ANA RIVER TRAIL
CITY OF REDLANDSPROPOSED CLASS 1/4 BIKE PATH
CONNECTION TO CITY OF HIGHLANDPROPOSED CLASS 2 BIKE LANE AND CLASS 1 BIKE PATH ON CITY CREEK
COUNTYPROPOSED CLASS 2BIKE LANE
kj kj
kjkjkj
kj ROUTE CONNECTION
PROPOSED CLASS 3BIKE ROUTE
COUNTY OF SAN BERN ARDINO
CITY BOUNDARY
CITY OF REDLANDS
CITY OF RED LA NDS
CITY OF REDLANDS
CITY OF HIGHLAND
CITY OF SAN BERN ARDINO
CITY BOUNDARY
kj
PROPOSED SANTA ANA RIVER TRAIL
PROPOSED CLASS 2BIKE LANE
PROPOSED CLASS 1BIKE PATH
kj
kj
FUTURE CLASS 2 BIKE LANE BY IVDA