Art3_Ontario_FY15_BikePed_Gst_App_CLOSED
Transportation Development Act Article 3 Phase 1
Call for Projects
For
Active Transportation Program Local Match Assistance
Project Name G Street and San Antonio Bike Corridors
Applicant (Agency name) City of Ontario
Applicant Contact (Name, title, email, phone # of
individual authorizing the application)
Thomas Danna, Traffic and Transportation Manager
tdanna@ci.ontario.ca.us, 909 395-2387
Partner Name(s) (if applicable) Cities of Chino, Montclair and Upland
Project Funding
ATP funds to be requested in Cycle 2 (80% of
total project cost) $633,338
Requested matching funds from TDA Article 3
(16% of total project cost) $126,667
20% Local Match (4% of total project cost –
please also identify the source of those funds) $31,667
Total project funds $791,672
Project Type
Bicycle X
(Bicycle projects must be consistent with San
Bernardino County NMTP)
Pedestrian □
Bicycle/Pedestrian □
Safe Routes to School □
Recreational Trail □
G Street and San Antonio Bike Corridors
Narrative Questions Page 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Design and construct bike facility improvements on two routes (described below and shown on
Attachment 1) that extend through four cities for a total of 17.81 miles. The improvements will include
bike detection at signalized intersections, designated street crossings where appropriate, signing and
striping in accordance with the Caltrans Highway design Manual and California Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices.
G Street Crosstown Bike Route: A combination of Class II and III improvements that extends
continuously from Mills Avenue on Orchard Street in Montclair thru Ontario on G Street, Vineyard
Avenue, Inland Empire Boulevard, Ontario Mills Loop, Franklin Avenue and Ontario Mills Pkwy and
terminates at Etiwanda Avenue at Ontario’s city limits. The portion of this route between Benson and
Milliken Avenues has been designed (See Attachment 2A).
San Antonio Avenue Bike Corridor: A combination of Class II, III and Sharrow/Bike Boulevard and
extends from Walnut Avenue in Chino thru Ontario on San Antonio Avenue, Vesta Street, Boulder
Avenue, Hawthorne Street and terminates at Foothill Boulevard in Upland (See Attachment 2B).
NARRATIVE QUESTIONS
1. Describe how your project will encourage increased bicycling and walking and generally improve
the ease of travel for non-motorized users.
The two bike facility improvements, G Street Crosstown Bike Route and San Antonio Corridor Bike
Route will provide multi-jurisdictional bike connections in western San Bernardino County to
increase access to bike lanes and routes for residents in Ontario, Montclair, Upland and Chino.
Screenline bike counts were conducted in April 2014 on G Street and in February 2015 on San
Antonio Avenue.
G Street Crosstown Bike Route will provide an alternative for Holt Boulevard for bicyclists given
the close proximity of Holt Boulevard to G/Orchard Streets. Traffic counts indicate, 100 bicyclists
used Holt Boulevard daily. Half of the bicyclists along Holt Boulevard are anticipated to use G
Street Crosstown Bike Route instead of Holt Boulevard since it is only half a mile north of Holt
Boulevard, the traffic volumes and speeds are lower on G Street than Holt Boulevard resulting in a
safer option for east-west bicycle travel.
CURRENT BIKE COUNTS
Bike Route
Current
Daily Bike
Trips
Current
Bikers from
Holt
Boulevard
Total Current
Average Daily
Riders
Total
Annual
Bike Trips
G Street Crosstown Bike Route 120 50 170 34,000
San Antonio Corridor Bike
Route
109 0 109 21,800
TOTAL 229 50 279 55,800
G Street and San Antonio Bike Corridors
Narrative Questions Page 2
Providing bike route improvements should increase the opportunities for bikers to ride along a
designated route that is planned for bikers. As described further in Question #2 (and depicted on
Attachment 2, these corridors provide access to 17 public schools, 17 parks, various regional
commercial and employment centers and public transit lines.
The anticipated growth in bike riders along these routes as a result of constructing the proposed
improvements was analyzed using the CARB Model, a New Orleans Study which analyzed the
increase in biking along a bike lane one year after it was constructed and a bike lane coverage
analysis.
New Orleans Study: A study was conducted in New Orleans analyzing the amount of bicycling
along a route before and after the construction of a Class II bike lane (Parker, Gustat and Rice
2011). This study found that the construction of the bike lane increased the bicycling along the
route by 56% in one year.
Bike Lane Coverage Analysis: This portion of western San Bernardino County has a low bike lane
coverage (per 1,000 population) as shown below:
EXISTING BIKE LANE COVERAGE
Ontario Montclair Upland Chino
Existing Bikeway Miles 3.94 0.85 39.41 27.49
Rate per 1,000 Population 0.024 0.023 0.525 0.336
Source: San Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan (Adjusted to 2014 DOF
Population Estimates
BIKE LANE COVERAGE AFTER PROPOSED PROJECT
Bikeway Miles After Project 18.05 2.81 40.78 27.86
Rate per 1,000 Population
after Project 0.108 0.075 0.543 0.341
Population as of 1/1/2014 based on DOF estimates
Studies have shown that expanding the bicycle lane system coverage increases the number of
commuters using bicycles to work. The census tracts along the proposed routes have 232 persons
who commute to work by bicycle. The construction of the proposed bicycle lanes will increase this
number to 418 cyclists, an increase of over 80%.
CARB Model: The California Air Resources Board has a model that analyzes, in part, the impact of
constructing Class I and II bike facilities and the impact of activity centers that are in close
proximity (¼ and ½ mile) to the new bike facility (including regional commercial uses, civic
centers, and community centers as shown on Attachments 3A and 3B). The presence of activity
centers near the routes increases the likelihood of additional bike trips along the routes. Below
are the forecasts of annual bike trips and annual bike miles as a result of the construction of the
proposed bike lanes.
G Street and San Antonio Bike Corridors
Narrative Questions Page 3
EXISTING AND PROJECTED BIKE USE ON G STREET AND SAN ANTONIO BIKE CORRIDORS
Existing
New Bicycling Forecasts
% Change
CARB
Model
New
Orleans
Study
Bike Lane
Coverage
CARB
Model
New
Orleans
Study
Bike Lane
Coverage
Annual
Bike Trips
55,800 15.000 31,248 37,200 70,800 87,048 93,000 26.9%-66.7&
Annual
Bike Miles
83,700 27,000 46,872 55,800 110,700 130,572 139,500 32.3%-66.7%
Note: Trip length is assumed to be 1.5 miles and the number of days per year of biking potential is assumed to be 200
days.
2. Describe how the project creates or improves walking and/or bicycling routes and connectivity
to destinations, and how it removes barriers to walking and/bicycling.
The proposed bike routes will be the first bike facilities to serve these established neighborhoods
in western San Bernardino County. As shown on the attached maps (Attachment 2A and 2B), the
two routes will serve more than two dozen schools, more than two dozen public parks, numerous
community centers, libraries, city halls, and other public facilities within one mile of the routes.
The G Street Crosstown Bike Route will provide access for residents to the regional commercial
uses found at and around Ontario Mills Mall and the employment centers found in downtown
Upland, Ontario, in Ontario Airport Metro Center and the industrial uses, including extensive
warehouse uses, found in eastern Ontario, western Fontana and the southern portions of Rancho
Cucamonga.
Both the G Street Crosstown Bike Route and the San Antonio Avenue Bike Corridor offer a great
opportunity to connect riders from their homes to various destinations. Where feasible, restriping
of the roadway will allow for designated bike lanes to safely accommodate riders thru the area.
Re-routing of a segment of the bike route off San Antonio Avenue and through a residential
neighborhood allows for the bikers to travel in a shared lane on local residential streets with low
traffic volumes and low vehicle speeds.
The proposed bike routes were designed to connect to existing and future bicycle facilities in
Upland (Foothill Boulevard existing Class II and Pacific Electric Trail, existing Class 1), Montclair
(Mills Avenue existing Class II) Fontana (Etiwanda Avenue future Class II) and Chino (Walnut
Avenue future Class II).
3. Describe how the project reduces the number and/or rate of pedestrian and bicycle fatalities
and injuries.
There were 49 bicycle related collisions along the two proposed bike corridors between 2003 and
2012 (TIMS). It is anticipated that half of the riders on Holt Boulevard will shift to G Street which
can better accommodate bicyclists safely. The table below shows the number of bicycle collisions
G Street and San Antonio Bike Corridors
Narrative Questions Page 4
along the two routes and half of the bicycle collisions along Holt Boulevard Attachments 4A and
4B show the location and severity of bicycle collisions along the proposed bicycle corridors.
BICYCLE COLLISIONS (2003 – 2012)
Severity 1
(Fatal)
Severity 2
(Severe Injury)
Severity 3
(Visible Injury)
Severity 4
(Complaint of Pain)
TOTAL
G Street 0 3 12 11 26
San Antonio 0 0 10 13 23
Half of Collisions
on Holt
.5 .5 8.5 8 17.5
TOTAL .5 3.5 30.5 32 66.5
Source: TIMS
G Street Crosstown Bike Route: The western and central portion of this route travels through
existing residential areas. G Street and Orchard Streets are residential collectors with parking on
both sides of the street. Segments have low enough traffic volumes so the roadway can be
restriped to accommodate a designated bike lane. Where the volumes and roadway width is too
narrow, a signed Class III Bike Route can be accommodated which will inform drivers of the
potential presence of bicyclists. The eastern portion of this route is in a more commercial
environment, Class III Bike Route signs will be installed to inform drivers that bicyclists may be
using this roadway. Bicycle detection will be installed at all the signalized intersections to better
accommodate bicyclists.
San Antonio Avenue Bike Corridor: The southern portion of San Antonio Avenue Bike Corridor
has adequate right of way and low enough traffic volumes to restripe a bike lane along the existing
street. San Antonio Avenue Bike Corridor is proposed to be routed off San Antonio Avenue via
Vesta, Boulder and Hawthorne as a Sharrow/Bike Boulevard in order to work around the
bottleneck on San Antonio Avenue where the traffic volumes and roadway width cannot safely
accommodate a bike lane. The northern portion of the bike corridor has variable roadway widths.
This segment has the highest concentration of bicycle collisions. Installing signs along this
segment should help alert drivers that bicyclists may be present and incorporating appropriate
crossings and transitions along the route will improve safety. Bicycle detection will be installed at
all the signalized intersections to better accommodate bicyclists.
4. Describe the community based public participation process that culminated in the project
proposal.
During ATP Cycle 1, we held a public forum to discuss bike facilities in the community. Out of that
forum and our ongoing discussions with Ontario Wheelhouse (local bike advocates) regarding
bicycle facility needs in the area, both the G Street Crosstown and San Antonio Avenue Bike
Corridor Routes were prioritized as routes for improvement. The Wheelhouse has collected input
from their members regarding routes and destinations in the community that reinforce the need
G Street and San Antonio Bike Corridors
Narrative Questions Page 5
for both a north-south route through the heart of western San Bernardino County to interconnect
the cities of Upland, Ontario and Chino and an east-west route to connect riders in western San
Bernardino County with Los Angeles County. These routes provide access for riders to the job
centers in eastern Ontario, and regional commercial uses at Ontario Mills. In addition, a public
forum to discuss the ATP application is planned to gather broader input from the local biking
community.
Ontario Wheelhouse has recently begun family bike riding days to teach safe riding practices and
encourage biking in the community. In addition, Kaiser funded Ontario Wheelhouse to provide
bicycle safety education in the community. Having both facility improvements and safety
education should help to increase riding and improve safety.
The City of Chino is in the process of preparing a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan which has
included numerous opportunities for public input. Bike facilities on San Antonio Avenue is one of
the routes recommended by Chino residents and local bike advocates. All four cities (Ontario,
Chino, Montclair and Upland) have Healthy Communities programs that encourage active living
and healthy eating and continuously seek input on how to improve the health in the community,
including active transportation.
5. Describe the health issues in the project area and how the project will address each of them.
Provide local health data and sources, and collaborative efforts with health agencies where
possible.
The cities of Ontario, Upland, Chino and Montclair have high concentration of deaths from
Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke.
DEATH RATES PER 100,000
Healthy People
202 National
Objective1 California1
San
Bernardino
County1 Ontario2 Upland2 Chino2 Montclair2
Coronary
Heart
Disease
100.8 106.2 130.1 254.2 186.2 197.8 222.0
Stroke 33.8 36.6 40.4 55.8 NA 54.7 N
1County Health Status Profiles 2014
2San Bernardino County: Our Community Vital Signs 2013 Data Report
These health issues can be improved with regular exercise. Biking to work, school, local
destinations and for recreational purposes is one way for individuals to get routine physical
activity. Studies indicate that biking several times a week can improve health. The proposed bike
routes would provide access to more than half dozen bus routes, bus hubs and Metrolink stations
that would increase the opportunities for individuals to bike to public transit stops for their travel
to work. In addition, the routes would provide access to more than two dozen schools along the
routes which may increase the opportunities for students to bike to school. The routes would
G Street and San Antonio Bike Corridors
Narrative Questions Page 6
connect to the existing regional bike system (Mills Avenue, Foothill Boulevard and Pacific Electric
Trail).
The Healthy Ontario Initiative was formed to address the City of Ontario, California’s obesity
epidemic and itinerant diseases, such as heart disease and diabetes. The Healthy Ontario
Collaborative is a partnership of non-profit agencies, school districts, Department of Public Health
and local businesses that have adopted the model of Collective Impact, a systemic approach to
social impact for needle-moving change by aligning organizations and resources across four pillars
of health that are outlined in our Healthy Ontario Master Plan: 1) Prevention and Wellness; 2)
Health Care Access; 3)Education and Lifelong Learning; 4) Safe and Complete Neighborhoods.
Through the collaborative efforts of Healthy Ontario partners and the Safe and Complete
Neighborhood workgroup, walking and biking to school and other destinations was identified as
the key strategy and focus area for the workgroup to improve the health and mental wellness of
our residents and also a way in which our youth can meet the Center for Disease Controls 60
minute a day physical activity requirement for optimal health and wellness.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Cost Benefit Analysis: Based on the Cost-Benefit Analysis Tool Version 1.0 recently created by Caltrans,
the Benefit-Cost Ratio for this project will be 35.52.
Disadvantaged Communities:
Approximately 84% of the persons living in census tracts along the two bike routes live within census
tracts that are designated as disadvantaged pursuant to CalEnviron Screen 2.0 (See Attachment 5). Very
few persons in the Census Tracts along these routes bike to work (.46%) which is far below the State
average of 1.07% even though more than 100,000 jobs are within easy biking distance. As shown below,
more than 90% of the schools along the two bike routes have more than 75% of the students who are
eligible for the Free or Reduced Price Meal Program.
% STUDENTS ELIGIBLE FOR FREE OR REDUCED PRICE MEAL PROGRAM (2013-14)
School %
Students
School %
Students
Berlyn Elementary 92.0% Lincoln Elementary 91.0%
Central Language Academy 76.7% Mariposa Elementary 93.5%
Chaffey High 83.4% Montclair High 79.7%
Citrus Elementary 81.5% Monte Vista Elementary 80.2%
Corona Elementary 94.1% Montera Elementary 86.6%
Del Norte Elementary 91.4% Ray Wiltsey Middle 93.5%
G Street and San Antonio Bike Corridors
Narrative Questions Page 7
School %
Students
School %
Students
El Camino Elementary 87.8% The Ontario Center 63.4%
Elderberry Elementary 91.1% Upland High 54.9%
Hawthorne Elementary 79.2% Vernon Middle 86.5%
Kingsley Elementary 84.6% Vina Danks Middle 86.0%
Lehigh Elementary 95.8% Vineyard Elementary 89.2%
DTP-0001 (Revised July 2013)
End Closeout Phase (Closeout Report)
End Environmental Phase (PA&ED Milestone)
Begin Design (PS&E) Phase
End Design Phase (Ready to List for Advertisement Milestone)
Begin Right of Way Phase
Right of Way
SCAG
Project Title
Project ID
End Right of Way Phase (Right of Way Certification Milestone)
Begin Construction Phase (Contract Award Milestone)
PS&E
Construction
Tom Danna
PPNO
County Project Sponsor/Lead Agency
City of Ontario
EA
PM Bk PM Ahd
08
Project Manager/Contact
SB
Local Assistance
Draft Project Report
Route/Corridor
07/15/16
ProposedProject Milestone
District
PA&ED
09/15/16
04/29/17
08/15/16
Implementing Agency
City of Ontario
City of Ontario
None
Begin Environmental (PA&ED) Phase
The 2 bike corridors will serve 4 cities in western San Bernardino County where bike lane coverage is very
low. The proposed routes will connect to existing bike lanes to the north and west and connect residents to
schools, community centers, shopping, government and health related services and the more than 100,000
jobs in the area. This project has the potential to increase bicycle ridership and improve cycling safety by
installing bike route improvements in two corridors that provide subsatntial regional connectivity between the
four partner agencies on streets with low traffic volumes. It provides the opportunity for improved regular
exercise in an area with high obesity, Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke rates.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ● DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST
Date:3/11/15
General Instructions
Design and construct two bike routes for a total of 17.81 miles which includes: 1) G Street from Mills Avenue
within the City of Montclair to Etiwanda Avenue in the City of Ontario, and 2) San Antonio Avenue from
Foothill Blvd. within the City of Upland, through the City of Ontario to Walnut Avenue within the City of Chino
in the south. The project will include installing bike detection at signalized intersections, bike route signing
and markings to improve regional bicycle circulation.
MPO
Location, Project Limits, Description, Scope of Work See page 2
G Street and San Antonio Bike Corridors
MPO ID TCRP No.
For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD
(916) 654-3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.
01/15/16
09/30/16
01/15/17
12/15/16
E-mail Address
Project Study Report Approved
Component
Phone
909 395-2387
Includes Bike/Ped ImprovementsIncludes ADA Improvements
Element
tdanna@ci.ontario.ca.us
Supports Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Goals Reduces Greenhouse Gas Emissions
City of Ontario
Purpose and Need See page 2
Project Benefits See page 2
The bike route improvements increases the opportunities for over 200 bikers per day to ride along a
designated route planned for bicycle traffic, improving access to 17 public schools, 17 parks, various regional
commercial and employment centers and multiple public transit lines.
End Construction Phase (Construction Contract Acceptance Milestone)
CE/CEDocument TypeCirculate Draft Environmental Document
ADA Notice
04/30/17
06/30/17
Begin Closeout Phase
New Project
DTP-0001 (Revised July 2013)Date:3/11/15
District EA
08
Project Title:
Component Prior 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20+Total
E&P (PA&ED)40 40
PS&E 79 79
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON 673 673
TOTAL 792 792
Fund No. 1:
Component Prior 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20+Total
E&P (PA&ED)32 32
PS&E 63 63
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON 538 538
TOTAL 633 633
Fund No. 2:
Component Prior 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20+Total
E&P (PA&ED)6 6
PS&E 13 13
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON 108 108
TOTAL 127 127
Fund No. 3:
Component Prior 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20+Total
E&P (PA&ED)2 2
PS&E 3 3
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON 27 27
TOTAL 32 32
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ● DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Route TCRP No.
PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST
County Project ID PPNO
G Street and San Antonio Bike Corridors
SB
TDA Art 3 Program Code
Proposed Funding ($1,000s)
Proposed Total Project Cost ($1,000s)Notes
Funding Agency
ATP Program Code
Proposed Funding ($1,000s)
Funding Agency
Funding Agency
Local Program Code
Proposed Funding ($1,000s)
San AntonioBoulderVesta
HawthorneSan AntonioD St.I-10 Frwy.
Sixth St.
Foothill Blvd.
SR-60 Frwy.
Mission
B
l
v
d
.
G St.
Fourth St.
Holt Blvd.
Walnut St.
Eighth St.
Philadelphia St.Grove Ave.Haven Ave.Arrow Route
Francis St.Central Ave.Campus Ave.Milliken Ave.Etiwanda Ave.Phillips St.Mountain Ave.Sultana Ave.Euclid Ave.Monte Vista Ave.Seventh St.San Antonio Ave.Ramona Ave.Benson Ave.Arrow Hwy
Archibald Ave.Mills Ave.Vineyard Ave.Orchard Ave.Pipeline Ave.Moreno St.Benson Ave.Archibald Ave.Arrow Route
Vineyard Ave.±
0 0.75 1.5 2.25 30.375
Miles
PROPOSED BIKE FACILITIES
Date: 03/10/2015
Existing Bike Facilities
Class I I - Bike Path
Class II - Bike Lane
Class III - Bike Route
Proposed Bike Facilities
Class II - Bike Lane
Class III - Bike Route
Sharrow/Bike Blvd.
City
City of Montclair
City of OntarioCity of Chino
City of Upland
City of Ontario
City of Chino
City ofMontclair
City of Upland
ATTACHMENT 1
All Photos are looking
east/south.
ATTACHMENT 2A
ATTACHMENT 2B
Bus Route 61 Bus Route 80Bus Route 63
Bus Route 65Bus Route 68Bus Route 83Bus Route 81I-10 Frwy.D St.
Sixth St.
G St.
Holt Blvd.
Fourth St.
Eighth St.
Mission Blvd.
Seventh St.
Phillips St.Grove Ave.Haven Ave.Central Ave.Sultana Ave.Milliken Ave.Campus Ave.Euclid Ave.Etiwanda Ave.Mountain Ave.Orchard Ave.Mills Ave.Monte Vista Ave.San Antonio Ave.Benson Ave.Ramona Ave.Vineyard Ave.Moreno St.Archibald Ave.Arrow Highway
San Bernardino St.Benson Ave.Uses Near G Street Crosstown Bike Route
´
Date: 03/10/2015
0 1 2 3 40.5
Miles
Proposed Bike Route Elementary Schools Middle Schools High Schools University & Colleges Parks Community Centers Government Services Library Other Bus Routes
G Street Lehigh
Montera
Monte Vista
El Camino
Kingsley
Elderberry
Hawthorne
Central
Berlyn Avenue
Lincoln
Vineyard
Del Norte
Mariposa
Corona
Ontario Center
Vernon
Vina Danks
Ray Wiltsey
Montclair
Chaffey
Valley View
University of LaVerne
College of Law
Sunset
Wilderness Basin
Alma Hofman
Saratoga
Kingsley
Sunrise
Girls Softball Field
George Gibbs
Munoz
James Bryant
Nugents
Sam Alba
John Galvin
Littleton Ball Park
Grove Memorial
Veteran's Memorial
James Galanis
Vineyard
Guati Regional
Ontario Motor Speedway
Ontario Town Square
Ontario Senior Center
Ontario Museum
Munoz
Veterans
Montclair City Hall
Ontario City Hall
Social Sercurity
Post Office
County Health
County Probation
Montclair
Ontario
Ontario Wheelhouse
Ontario Mills
Montclair Hospital
Ontario Airport
Citizens Business
Bank Arena
Route 61
Route 63
Route 65
Route 68
Route 80
Route 81
Route 83
Activity Centers/Destinations
J^Airport
City Hall
Community Center
ÆP Hospital
Library n£Bus Hub
I2 Amtrak/Metrolink Stop
Bus Route
Parks
Schools and Parks
College
High
Middle
Elementary
Bike Improvements
Class I
Class II
Class III
Existing Proposed
Uses Within 1 MIle of G Street Crosstown Bike Route
ATTACHMENT 3A
Within 1 Mile from Proposed Route
Area in Proximity to Route
Within 1/4 Mile from Proposed Route
Within 1/2 Mile from Proposed Route
n£
I2
I2
I2
n£
n£
I2I2 I2
Bus Route 83Bus Route 63Bus Route 80
Bus Route 68
Bus Route 61
Bus Route 65Bus Route 81Bus Route 365
Chaffey
Upland
Ontario
Oaks
Vernon
De Anza
Liberty
Sultana
Ontario Christian
Haynes
Citrus
Kingsley
El Camino
Lincoln
Bon View
Elderberry
Berlyn Ave.
Vina Danks
Euclid
Hawthorne
Edison
Central
Ontario Christian
Vista Grande
Baldy View
Chaffey Adult School
Western Christian
Levi Dickey
Linda Vista Kindergarten
Redeemer Lutheran
University of La Verne (Law)
Mountain Av Christian
Del Norte
Maple Street Preschool
St. George Catholic
Ontario Progressive Montessori
Munoz
De Anza
John Galvin
Citrus
Saratoga
Bon View
Homer Briggs
Kimball
Cypress
Centennial
James Bryant
Alma Hofman
South Bon View
Sam Alba
Fern Reservoir
Nugent's
D St.
G St.Grove Ave.Campus Ave.Mountain Ave.Central Ave.I-10 Frwy.
Holt Blvd.Euclid Ave.Walnut St.
Chino Ave.
Sixth St.Sultana Ave.SR-60 Frwy.
Francis St.
Eighth St.
Fourth St.
Riverside Dr.
Foothill Blvd.
Mission Blvd.Benson Ave.Phillips St.
Seventh St.
Arrow Hwy
Philadelphia St.
Moreno St.
Arrow Route
Orchard Ave.
Arrow Highway
Benson Ave.ATTACHMENT 3BUses Near San Antonio Bike Corridor
0 0.55 1.1 1.65 2.20.275
Miles
´
Bike Improvements
Class I
Class II
Class III
Existing Proposed
Activity Centers/Destinations
J^Airport
City Hall
Community Center
ÆP Hospital
Library n£Bus Hub
I2 Amtrak/Metrolink Stop
Bus Route
Parks
Schools and Parks
College
High
Middle
Elementary
Elementary Schools Middle Schools High Schools University & Colleges Parks
Baldy View
Citrus
El Camino
Elderberry
Edison
Central
Kingsley
Haynes
Vista Grande
Sultana
Redeemer Lutheran
Ontario Christian
Mountain Avenue Christian
St. George Catholic
Vernon
Vina Danks
Oaks
Upland
Chaffey
Ontario
Ontario Christian
Western Christian
University of LaVerne
College of Law
Baldy View
Fern Reservoir
Citrus
Munoz
George Gibbs
Girls Softball Field
James Bryant
Cypress
De Anza
Del Rancho
Home Briggs
Nugents
Sam Alba
Community Centers Government Services Library Other Bus Routes
Ontario Senior Center
Ontario Museum
Munoz
Armstrong
De Anza
Upland City Hall
Ontario City Hall
Upland
Ontario
Ontario Wheelhouse Route 61
Route 63
Route 68
Route 80
Route 81
Route 83
Within 1 Mile of Proposed Route
Within 1/2 Mile of Proposed Route
Within 1/4 Mile of Proposed Route
Uses Within 1 Mile of San Antonio Bike Corridor
Date: 03/10/2015
D St.
G St.Orchard Ave.Mills Ave.Euclid Ave.Benson Ave.Ramona Ave.Mountain Ave.Monte Vista Ave.San Antonio Ave.D St.
G St.
I-10 Frwy.Grove Ave.Euclid Ave.Sultana Ave.Campus Ave.Vineyard Ave.Bicycle Collisions Along G Street Crosstown Bike Route
´
I-10 Frwy.Haven Ave.Milliken Ave.Etiwanda Ave.Western Section
Central Section
Eastern Section
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 10.125
MilesDate: 03/10/2015
Proposed Bicycle Route
Class II (Bike Lane)
Class III (Bike Route)
Schools and Parks
CollegeMiddle
Elementary High ParksBicycle Collision
1 - Fatal
2 - Severe Injury
3- Visible Injury
4 - Complaint of Pain
Bicycle Collision Data (2003 - 2012)G Street
1 - Fatal 0
2 - Severe Injury 3
3 - Visible Injury 12
4 - Complaint of Pain 11
Source: TIMS
ATTACHMENT 4A
BoulderSan AntonioVesta
Hawthorne
San AntonioD St.
G St.Mountain Ave.Sixth St.
I-10 Frwy.
Eighth St.
Fourth St.
Arrow Hwy
Seventh St.Euclid Ave.Foothill Blvd.EuclidD St.Euclid Ave.Mountain Ave.Holt Blvd.San Antonio Ave.Walnut St.
Phillips St.
Francis St.
SR-60 Frwy.
Mission Blvd.
Philadelphia St.
Bicycle Collisions Along San Antonio Bike Corridor
Proposed Bicycle Route
Class II (Bike Lane)
Class III (Bike Route)
Schools and Parks
College
Middle
Elementary
High
Parks
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 10.125
Miles
´
Bicycle Collision Data (2003 - 2012)San Antonio
1 - Fatal 0
2 - Severe Injury 0
3 - Visible Injury 10
4 - Complaint of Pain 13
Source: TIMS
ATTACHMENT 4B
Bicycle Collisions
1 - Fatal
2 - Severe Injury
3- Visible Injury
4 - Complaint of Pain
Date: 03/10/2015
36.302598
46.645471
80.699143
61.366206
50.149441
27.45082
47.60015
38.390452
32.638369
44.24424
51.555521
40.41222832.218379
63.066342
37.933108
40.459396
44.26115
46.863518
35.111493
53.604623
42.490513
49.561005
65.54186
18.448264
27.70849
38.331192
42.592233
42.249945
44.58915646.453843 41.2103636.405029
32.977082
48.366983
51.524698
38.766477
68.29037
40.945267
49.394467
61.246439
39.246702
53.274842
38.894049 48.876272
68.082127
53.213712
48.103253
63.5187
64.909484
52.15835
51.301311
25.411543
28.03032
45.511339
37.97158
19.156654
28.319474 30.67899
26.851616
46.174621
31.314497 36.95053
55.476783
26.341324 19.88118333.36101424.124232 24.60528220.92249119.77671
62.720052
44.543593
52.291395
39.089917
62.589736
63.977499
23.799899
39.863703
45.123265
68.035199
60.200314
D St.I-10 Frwy.
Sixth St.
Foothill Blvd.
Mission
B
l
v
d
.
G St.
SR-60 Frwy.
Fourth St.
Holt Blvd.
Walnut St.
Eighth St.
Philadelphia St.Grove Ave.Haven Ave.Arrow Route
Francis St.Central Ave.Milliken Ave.Campus Ave.Phillips St.Etiwanda Ave.Mountain Ave.Euclid Ave.Monte Vista Ave.Seventh St.Ramona Ave.Arrow Hwy
Benson Ave.Archibald Ave.Mills Ave.Vineyard Ave.EuclidArrow Highway
San Jose St.Benson Ave.Archibald Ave.±0 0.75 1.5 2.25 30.375
Miles
CALENVIRONSCREEN SCORES ALONG PROPOSED BIKE ROUTES
Date: 03/10/2015
Proposed Bike Routes/Lanes
Class II (Bike Lane)
Class III (Bike Route)
CalEnvironScreen Score Percentiles
Top 5.1 - 10% CalEnvironScreen Scores
Top 5% CalEnvironScreen Scores
Top 15.1 - 20% CalEnvironScreen Scores
Top 10.1 - 15% CalEnvironScreen Scores Top 20.1 - 25% CalEnvironScreen Scores
Not Top 25% CalEnvironScreen Scores
ATTACHMENT 5